Search for: "California v. Law" Results 1741 - 1760 of 34,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California Domestic Violence Cases: When the victim contacts the defendant
5 May 2010, 5:32 pm
See, People v Gams (1997) 52 CA 4th 147 and California Penal Code Section 13710 (b), Family Code section 6345, California Code Civil Procedure section 533. [read post]
West Coast Criminal Defense Strikeforce - http://westcoastcriminaldefensestrikeforce.blogspot.com/
California Court of Appeal Concludes That Unionized Employees and Their Employers Cannot Negotiate Away Compensation for Required Travel Time Continue Reading…
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by <a href='https://www.ebglaw.com/vanessa-k-manolatou/'>Vanessa Manolatou</a>
 In Carlos Gutierrez v. [read post]
Wage & Hour Defense Blog - http://www.wagehourblog.com/
Understanding the Ministerial Exception in California Employment Lawsuits
7 Feb 2022, 8:29 am by Nassiri Law
In Orr v. [read post]
Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog - http://www.orangecountyemploymentlawyersblog.com/
California Court of Appeal Issues Employer-Friendly Ruling Rejecting Employee’s Claims Under the California Family Rights Act
1 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by Lynberg & Watkins
KirbyThe California Court of Appeal recently overturned a jury verdict won by an employee who claimed that she was entitled to return to her previous position with the County of Los Angeles after taking a lengthy medical leave of absence.In Rogers v. [read post]
Lynberg & Watkins Employment Law Blog - http://www.lwemploymentlaw.com/
Delaware Superior Court Explains Limits Of Choice Of Law In Contracts
24 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Edward M. McNally
Change Capital Partners Fund I, LLC v. [read post]
Delaware Business Litigation Report - http://www.morrisjames.com/blogs-Delaware-Business-Litigation-Report
Ford Petitions California Supreme Court to Review Buell-Wilson v. Ford
1 May 2008, 2:24 pm
As a matter of California law and federal due process, are punitive damages prohibited in product liability cases where the manufacturer's design conformed to objective indicators of reasonable safety, including industry standards and custom, governmental safety standards and policy judgments, and the existence of a genuine debate about what the law requires? [read post]
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
Is Three Still a Crowd? Polygamy and the Law After Obergefell v. Hodges
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Lawrence M. Friedman
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
New Employee Classification Test Signed into Law
19 Sep 2019, 10:37 am by HRWatchdog
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
HR Watchdog - http://hrwatchdog.calchamber.com/
Rodriguez v. RWA Trucking: Federal Law Preempts Certain Claims in Action by Truck Drivers, Does Not Preempt Others
27 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
California Law Requiring Female Board Members Challenged in Court
6 Aug 2019, 12:39 pm by Nassiri Law
In Crest et al v. [read post]
Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog - http://www.orangecountyemploymentlawyersblog.com/
California expands the notion of "present at the scene" and "a contemporaneous sensory observance" of an accident for purposes of a claim for emotional distress of a bystander
20 Aug 2024, 12:33 pm by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  It originated in California with the famous case of Dillon v. [read post]
Torts Blog - https://bernabetorts.blogspot.com/
Northern District of California Holds that Section 230 Applies to App Store
9 Jun 2021, 5:03 pm by Aaron Rubin and Scott Chen
Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
Socially Aware Blog - http://www.sociallyawareblog.com/
The California Court Of Appeals Weighs In On Option ARM Class Actions
31 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
See Boschma v. [read post]
Financial Institutions Law Blog - http://www.financialinstitutionlawblog.com/
California Imposes Immigration Regulations on Employers
25 Sep 2017, 2:51 pm by Katrina Walasik Forsyth
At this time, the ultimate constitutionality of the Act is uncertain under Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
Workforce Bulletin - https://www.workforcebulletin.com/
California Court Issues Another Unfavorable Meal Period Interpretation
18 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm
  In Lazarin v. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/
California Business Tax May Provide High Court Nexus Test
16 Apr 2019, 5:19 pm by Carley Roberts and Mike Le
Swart Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
SeeSALT Blog - https://seesalt.pillsburylaw.com/
California Supreme Court Holds California Statutes and Wage Orders do not Incorporate FLSA De Minimis Doctrine; Declines to Decide Whether De Minimis Principle May Ever Apply to Wage and Hour Claims
30 Jul 2018, 3:32 pm by <a href='http://gtlaw.com/People/MarkDKemple'>Mark Kemple</a> and <a href=''>Radha D.S. Kulkarni</a>
On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Troester v. [read post]
GT L&E Blog - http://www.gtleblog.com/
California Supreme Court Holds California Statutes and Wage Orders do not Incorporate FLSA De Minimis Doctrine; Declines to Decide Whether De Minimis Principle May Ever Apply to Wage and Hour Claims
30 Jul 2018, 3:32 pm by <a href='http://gtlaw.com/People/MarkDKemple'>Mark Kemple</a> and <a href=''>Radha D.S. Kulkarni</a>
On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Troester v. [read post]
GT L&E Blog - http://www.gtleblog.com/
Netanel on Maharam of Padua v. Giutiniani
12 Dec 2007, 12:38 am
Netanel (University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law) has posted Maharam of Padua v. [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
California Supreme Court Limits Application of Commissioned Employee Exemption
16 Jul 2014, 10:23 am by Thomas Kaufman
On July 14, 2014, the California Supreme Court held in Peabody v. [read post]
Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/