Search for: "California v. Smith"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am
Ina Shoe Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
Mark Smith put that argument to rest in Attention Originalists. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 7:30 pm
Background The 2025 Proposed Rule is statutorily based on the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 (the Ryan Haight Act), which was enacted after the death of an 18-year-old high school student in California due to under-regulated internet pharmacies in the early 2000s. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Mills, Inc., 662 F.3d 423, 426 (7th Cir. 2011); see also Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Mills, Inc., 662 F.3d 423, 426 (7th Cir. 2011); see also Smith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
In Barrett v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
A silver medal goes to Michael's post on DeJohn v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm
Smith expanded the Thomas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
In California, the city of Hayward settled a case for $1.5 million when an off-leash police dog, searching for a suspect, mistakenly attacked a man sleeping under a bush. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
In California, the city of Hayward settled a case for $1.5 million when an off-leash police dog, searching for a suspect, mistakenly attacked a man sleeping under a bush. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
(Zelig v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In California, for example, simple nudity is not a crime. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
ESTNorthern Illinois Huskies v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
InFacts v Daily Express. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
In a Guardian Comment piece Joan Smith argued that the Mahmood conviction demonstrated the urgent need for Leveson Part 2. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Smith, in which the Court prohibited an after-the-fact referendum from interfering with a state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
