Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 52,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Three people in the bar ended up dead, and two others seriously wounded in the resulting gunfire. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
When a case hinges on “the intent” of a state it is easy to forget that this is an aggregation of many people’s states of mind and there are likely many voices in Israel who do not agree with the current course of action in Gaza. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:07 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
In many cases people do this without really understanding the consequences of what they are doing.The problems of using joint tenancies with children are again illustrated in a recent British Columbia case, Turner v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Perhaps that indicates how long the case has been in the courts. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
The Court also unanimously remanded People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am
The test is not how many people in fact accessed the photograph but how many relevant persons might have. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:37 am
People v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:14 am
I wonder if that's the case here. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am
On November 13, the Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Fernandez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:16 pm
The cases are as follows: Morar v Romania (App no. 25217/06) [2015] ECHR 668 (French only), Judgment of 7 July 2015, Third Section. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:32 am
Case citation: Hall v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
” Primus observed that the Supreme Court in the 1883 case Pace v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:00 pm
”That must have dogged them all.# # #DECISIONC. v O'R. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 4:41 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an important tax case, Moore v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 pm
The case of ABC v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am
Of course, this case may be difficult in the current political context: for example, the politics of Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 7:13 am
People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 11:56 pm
The Court explained that "we have held that 'a defendant who does not rest after the court fails to grant a motion to dismiss at the close of the People's case, proceeds with the risk that he will inadvertently supply a deficiency in the people's case.' Thus, a defendant who presents evidence after a court has declined to grant a trial motion to dismiss made at the close of the People's case waives subsequent review… [read post]
