Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 1741 - 1760 of 31,278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2023, 2:04 am by Dr. Laura McGuire, Guest Contributor
Their child is sick, they are going through a divorce, or there is a loss in the family. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm by NARF
" “The gold standard of child welfare” under attack: The Indian Child Welfare Act and Haaland v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 10:19 am by Aaron Weems
In my role as the host of PBA Family Law Section’s podcast “Law in the Family,” I spoke with Helen Casale about the recent Superior Court case, Glover v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:30 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The child was born with severe brain damage, which will affect them forever. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This means that schools, libraries, and digital resources must now more than ever equip young people to bridge the distance between the promise and reality of American constitutional democracy.[13] Debate and disagreement relevant to Justice Thurgood Marshall once explained, “A child born to a Black mother in a state like Mississippi... has exactly the same rights as a white baby born to the wealthiest person in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:14 am by Frank Cranmer
Fifthly, what had happened was not equivalent to the gradual grooming of a child for sexual gratification by a person in authority over that child: “the violent and appalling rape was not an objectively obvious progression from what had gone before but was rather a shocking one-off attack. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]