Search for: "Clark v. State" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The “doctrine of judicial estoppel may bar a party from pursuing claims which were not listed in a previous bankruptcy proceeding” (Moran Enters., Inc. v Hurst, 160 AD3d 638, 640 [2d Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 908 [2018], rearg denied 32 NY3d 1195 [2019]; see Popadyn v Clark Constr. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
 Master Clark considered the authorities including HHJ Hacon's interpretation of the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Ltd [2015] UKSC 10: "I interpret this to mean that in order to fix an alleged joint tortfeasor with liability, it must be shown both that he actively co-operated to bring about the act of the primary tortfeasor and also that he intended that his co-operation would help to bring about that act (the act found to be tortious). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:27 am by James Jolin
But, as for congressional action, Ali argued for an update to the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which the Supreme Court invalidated in its seminal 1997 City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Asay ("This Article disaggregates open innovation communities and assesses the actual risks that patents pose to different categories of participants in open innovation communities.")Why Technology Customers Are Being Sued En Masse for Patent Infringement & What Can Be Done, by Colleen V. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:34 am
Taft continues to be appealed.Six more death row inmates in Ohio joined Cooey v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 3:15 pm
As Justice Clark explained in Mapp v. [read post]