Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 9:50 pm
can reimburse the company for direct expenses incurred by Manville in providing administrative and asset management services to the plans without causing an ERISA section 406 prohibited transaction. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:59 am
(c) Respondent engaged in the conduct described above in paragraph IV(b) because Charging Party Becker engaged in the conduct described above in paragraph IV(a) and to discourage employees from engaging in these or other concerted activities. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:31 am
C. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:31 am
C. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:29 pm
Private false marking suits are typically based on the simple premise that (a) a product is labeled with a patent number, (b) the patent is expired, and (c) the product seller knew or should have known of the error. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court held that the appellant did not ground the assertion that the message communicated by the whole slogan should have been capable to distinguish the company and its products or services from other companies. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
Facebook Inc argued that the Commissioner failed to establish a prima facie case that, at the relevant time, Facebook Inc: carried on business in Australia within the meaning of s 5B(3)(b) of the Privacy Act; or collected or held personal information in Australia within the meaning of s 5B(3)(c) of the Privacy Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:47 pm
§ 5-1102(b)(3). [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
Sometime in 1970, Congress enacted the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA), as amended, which authorized the formation of respondent corporation, a private nonprofit corporation, of which most broker-dealers registered under § 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 78o(b), are required to be members. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 7:39 am
(Holland, MI), Franklin; Lloyd C. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:22 am
Shah liable for: (a) disgorgement of $8,201,464.96; (b) prejudgment interest of $1,755,865.09; and (c) a civil penalty of $24,604,394.88. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 1:06 pm
b. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
Their collective view was that shape element (A) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(i) and shape elements (B) and (C) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(ii), but that neither Article 3(1)(e)(i) nor (ii) applied to all of (A), (B) and (C) together. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:06 pm
As the CJEU held in Ford Motor Company, Art. 110 CDR does not limit trade mark rights. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:37 am
Exhibit B: Savvy shoppers know when they see “new and improved” or “new look” on a package that could be a clue that the product has been downsized. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:07 pm
A couple of days ago I mentioned in passing that two very large deepwater drilling companies were merging: Houston-based Pride International and ENSCO. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:40 am
B. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
On Monday 8 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Burnett or Grant v International Insurance Company of Hanover Limited. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:19 am
Word Mark Click To View 5366639 ALTERNATIVE & DIRECT INVESTMENT SECURITIES ASSOCIATION TSDR 5365157 GEARPET TSDR 5365049 CHROMATIC TSDR 5364979 COUPONCABIN SIDEKICK TSDR 5364834 GRIZZLY PEAK TSDR 5364826 SPLASH TECH TSDR 5364449 TAYCO TSDR 5363906 PA & MA’S BAR-B-QUE SAUCE TSDR 5363831 MEADFUL THINGS & OUTCIDERS FESTIVAL TSDR 5363824 N NEWDAY TSDR 5363823 4INK TSDR 5363813 NEW DAY CRAFT TSDR 5363410 TRADING RAPPERS TSDR 5363342 FF FAITH & FLOURISH TSDR 5363215… [read post]
