Search for: "Cornell v. Cornell"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Cornell Law School Dean and prominent property law scholar Eduardo Peñalver’s has posted a thoughtful review of my book The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm
And that's what I actually hope will happen, but for the sake of clarification.As the Cornell Law School webpage explains, there are different opinions on what the "high" in Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" means.What would benefit Trump would be an interpretation of "high" as "very serious," as some argue that the word "other" means it must be at a level with treason and bribery. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:30 pm
His poetic inclination is perhaps the most prominent in tort cases: As Guido reflects on one of his first opinions, Taber v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:09 am
As explicated at great length in McDonald v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:01 am
So it was interesting to me to encounter a recent Tax Court decision, Voight v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm
The presence or absence of probable cause—defined as such grounds as would induce an ordinarily prudent and cautious person, under the circumstances, to believe that plaintiff had committed the crimes as held in Smith v County of Nassau—can be decided as a matter of law where the facts leading up to an arrest and inferences to be drawn therefrom are not in dispute based on Parkin v Cornell Univ. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 4:29 am
“Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telphone Service (1991, US Sup Ct). [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Hence, Google relies on Kelly v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:07 am
In Mapp v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:27 pm
While Chief Justice Roberts' NFIB v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:02 pm
Peter Martin and I were meeting with the Supreme Court’s Director of Data Services to talk a bit about what we were doing with Supreme Court materials at Cornell. [read post]
16 May 2014, 3:30 am
Which I think is legal, based on Gilmer v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 11:16 pm
Viens (Queen Mary, University of London) The Neuroscience of Fair Play: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Altruistic Behaviours and Their FailuresDonald Pfaff (Rockefeller University, New York) Brain Images As Legal EvidenceAdina Roskies and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Dartmouth College) 13.15 LUNCH 14:15 SESSION III: The Illusion of Intentionality and Its Implications for Criminal LawColin Blakemore (Nuffield Department of Clinical Sciences, Oxford University)… [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 10:18 am
Before the parties’ petition to the Supreme Court could be decided, the Supreme Court issued their decision in Mayo v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:46 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will give remarks to the Cornell Club of Washington DC on September 24 before traveling to New York to receive the Roosevelt Institute’s 2015 Freedom Medal on September 29. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
