Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C" Results 1741 - 1760 of 7,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 7:46 am by Mack Sperling
Par. 11 & n.8), (2) Johnson would have been due substantial severance benefits under the Progress Management Change-In-Control Plan even if his  Employment Agreement with Duke had never been formalized, and (3) Duke received agreements from Johnson in consideration of the severance payments, like (a) a release of claims against Duke; (b) an agreement to cooperate with Duke in respect to transition matters and (c) non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement and… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
 One significant difference in Side-C claims is that, unlike Side-B claims, a Side-C claim does not present any retirement of individual liability, but only pays for the elimination of corporate liability. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:53 am by Michael Geist
The standard includes assessments on whether the agreement provides fair compensation, allocates an appropriate portion of compensation to news content, doesn’t allow corporate influence to undermine freedom of expression, contributes to the sustainability of the Canadian news marketplace, ensure benefits for independent local news businesses, and involves a wide range of news outlets (Section 11(1)(b)). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm by Law Lady
SIGNATURE FLIGHT SUPPORT CORPORATION, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 5th District.Contracts -- Staffing agreement -- Indemnification -- Error to dismiss with prejudice fifth amended complaint alleging defendant breached duty to indemnify plaintiff for claims against plaintiff which were caused by defendant's employees -- Although defendant contended that plaintiff was not party to contract, plaintiff alleged the agreement extended coverage to contracting corporation's subsidiary,… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
‘(B) 10-percent INTEREST- The term ‘10-percent interest’ means— ‘(i) in the case of an interest in a corporation, ownership of at least 10 percen [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 7:51 am by Arina Shulga
 So, conducting a Rule 506(b) private placement to accredited investors and a Regulation CF offering at the same time is possible.The InvestorsThe good news is that investors do not have to be accredited. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The “reasonable steps” requirement in s. 150.1(4) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:54 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
This is so because § 440.10(1)(b) makes B, C, and D “one and the same business or establishment. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 1:21 pm by Christopher Simon
P. 15(c)(1)(B)-(C), her amended complaint could not relate back under federal law either. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:07 am by Gene Takagi
While the L3C is not subject to the same operational test as a 501(c)(3), I wonder if the L3C's mandate to significantly further a charitable or educational purpose within the meaning of IRC Section 170(c)(2)(B) combined with the PRI's primary purpose to further one or more exempt purposes under 170(c)(2)(B) is enough to create an issue. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
As an April post here noted, some people have been trying to get Google to deindex mainstream news articles — hide them from searchers by removing them from Google indexes — by (a) suing the people quoted in the articles, (b) getting stipulations from the people recanting their allegations, (c) getting court orders based on those recantations, and then (d) submitting those orders to Google. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 8:21 pm by Ron (mailto:ron@prismlegal.com)
Need predictability Yannucci: if we have to, my firm will get smaller to keep its focus on strategic work Yannucci: regional firms getting bigger b/c of focus on operational law support Yannucci implies that multi office global firms are stuck in middle Yannucci: cost to change firms b/c of institutional knowledge Faure: MP of top firm told me our lawyers feel no compulsion to change Hackett: the real challenge is not the firm, it is the client. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Supporting this, we find that the likelihood of (a) auditor turnover, (b) material accounting restatements, (c) class-action lawsuits, and (d) performance-related delistings all significantly increase with the intensity of pre-disclosure short selling. [read post]