Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 48,939
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 8:51 am
” LaMothe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Golomore Assoc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:08 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 1320 The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal in relation to costs but dismissed it in relation to declaratory relief. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 4:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 6:47 am
As an example of the high-risk employers face when trying to push out an older worker without a fair package, in Dawe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:31 am
In Explorer Insurance Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:33 pm
See Pascale v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 9:48 am
Yesterday we discussed the outrageous attorneys fees in the Robertson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 8:33 pm
No, said the Court of Appeal in Dockerill v Tullett [2012] EWCA Civ 184 (heard with the linked appeals of Macefield v Bakos and Tubridy v Sarwar). [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:58 am
Regina (Eastenders Cash & Carry plc and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (No 2) [2012] EWCA Civ 689; [2012] WLR (D) 159 “The protection against costs provided to HM Revenue and Customs by section 144(2) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, in respect of proceedings brought against them on account of the seizure or detention of any thing on reasonable grounds, applied to claims for judicial review. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:51 am
Financial Services Authority v Sinaloa Gold plc and others (Barclays Bank plc intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 1158; [2011] WLR (D) 295 “When obtaining an injunction the Financial Services Authority should not normally be required to give an undertaking in damages to third parties, beyond an undertaking to cover the costs incurred in complying with the injunction.” WLR Daily, 18th october 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:07 am
F & C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd and others v Barthelemy and another (No 3) [2012] EWCA Civ 843; [2012] WLR (D) 183 “Where an offer to settle proceedings had been made which was neither in substance nor in form compliant with Part 36, it was wrong in principle to take as directly analogous, and as applicable, the potential costs consequences had it been a Part 36 offer.” WLR Daily, 22nd June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 2:04 pm
Requiring a release is fine, but requiring indemnification makes the 998 offer impossible to value -- because who knows if someone else is going to sue you, or what the defense costs will be of such an action -- and hence makes it unenforceable.So holds the Court of Appeal today.Inserting the indemnification provision was a particularly unwise move in the present case, in which the 998 offer was merely for a waiver of costs. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:42 am
The cost of private school can be as much annually as college tuition. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:58 pm
In a "split" appellate opinion, a panel might essentially call it even on the cost front. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:49 am
County’s duty as highway authority O’Connor and Others v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:27 am
Successor to polluter not liable under later law Regina (National Grid Gas plc) v Environment Agency House of Lords “A private company which had succeeded the state-owned British Gas in 1986 was not liable under legislation enacted in 1995 for the cost of removing contamination from land at a former gasworks which had been sold for housing in 1965. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:20 am
Corporate Officer of the House of Commons v Information Commissioner and Others Queen’s Bench Division “Shortcomings in transparency and accountability in the system of paying additional costs allowances to Members of Parliament justified full disclosure of detailed information concerning those payments of their residential expenses. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
Which is, in essence, splitting the difference even if it's wholly stupid.The case is Paroline v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 8:40 pm
While some employers fully cover or subsidize the cost of slip-resistant shoes, others pass their entire cost onto employees. [read post]
