Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 1741 - 1760 of 13,788
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am by Josh Blackman
Maybe the Roberts Court was right and the Burger Court was wrong.The post Reconsidering <i>United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
Thus, Carols Ari Sundfeld and Yasser Gabriel show that in Brazil courts do not recognize a place for general deference to the administration. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
 Plaintiff also sought to prevent officers from retaliating against him and others, claiming that an officer had raided the Wiccan locker and seized a book and a cord.In Martin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:37 am by sally
Supreme Court Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13 (10 March 2010) RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller Gmbh & Company KG (UK Production) [2010] UKSC 14 (10 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Chima v R [2010] EWCA Crim 416 (10 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Steenberg & Anor v Enterprise Inns Plc & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 201 (10 March 2010) Smith, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am by Evangelina Cantu
Summary of the Issues on Appeal and the Court’s Decisions  I list here the four issues on appeal to the Court and provide exact quotes from the opinion. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:31 am by Mack Sperling
  The answer is that in 2008, the Business Court became the route of review for tax cases decided in the Office of Administrative Hearings by an Administrative Law Judge. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:20 pm by David Jacobson
In Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 18 the High Court dismissed the appeal of Peter James Shafron, the company secretary and general counsel of James Hardie Industries Ltd (“JHIL”), against previous decisions that he contravened s 180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by failing to discharge his duties as an officer of JHIL with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person in his position would have… [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of McComb v Reasoner, 29 AD3d 795, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals has interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2)  to "require[ ] that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental department's chain of command" and that the Court of Appeals has further interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2) to:1. require that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the… [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am by INFORRM
The European Court reasoned that “the Broadcasting Council commenced the administrative proceedings against the applicant company on its own motion. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am by Christine Corcos
Echoes of the issues that Taft and Frankfurter confronted in 1913 may be heard in Myers and Wiener, in Justice Sutherland’s opinion for the Court in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Echoes of the issues that Taft and Frankfurter confronted in 1913 may be heard in Myers and Wiener, in Justice Sutherland’s opinion for the Court in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
Echoes of the issues that Taft and Frankfurter confronted in 1913 may be heard in Myers and Wiener, in Justice Sutherland’s opinion for the Court in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:36 pm
The Arkansas Supreme Court ruling in Arkansas Department of Correction v. [read post]