Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 1,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
Yellen Archibald Cox, left, Senator Edward Kennedy, fourth from left, attending Buckley v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Hopefully BMG v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
April 2004 CanadaAbstractAlthough some studies suggest positive effects of treatment for sexual offenders, most studies have been hampered by the unknown influence of selective attrition (e.g., volunteers and drop-outs). [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
See Bey v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (COX, J.) [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
(Cox Communications and Aruba have made similar requests i [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify associations between hair product use and uterine cancer using Cox proportional hazard models. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
The bill currently awaits Governor Spencer Cox’s signature and would take effect sixty (60) days after its signing.[1] Originally enacted in 2010, the Online Prescribing Act has allowed health care providers to register with the State to prescribe and dispense certain FDA-approved drugs via online pharmacies and utilization of telehealth visits. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am
Cox, ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (August 14, 2020). [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Paul Mollica calls this a genuine head-scratcher] Cox v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Hence Illinois unquestionably had jurisdiction over [petitioner]'s petition.[22] Furthermore, the court can still rule on grounds for dissolution of marriage even if the petitioner has not satisfied the 90-day residency requirement.[23] In Hermann v Hermann, 219 Ill [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
Session 3: Trade Secrets, Courtney Cox, Can the Law Force You to Lie? [read post]
