Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 8,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Greenbaum.In his Introduction, Ted Davis observes that in Matal v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:17 pm
After some thirty years of wrestling with the cumbersome six-part test set forth in Davis & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:17 pm
After some thirty years of wrestling with the cumbersome six-part test set forth in Davis & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:52 am
The Hornets should be watchable this year, what with Davis and Rivers. complaint shirtail v hornetsvar docstoc_docid="125590810";var docstoc_title="complaint shirtail v hornets";var docstoc_urltitle="complaint shirtail v hornets"; [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:46 am
Coverage of Wednesday’s argument in Buck v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:18 pm
Saul (consolidated with Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm
Our thanks to Legal Action’s ‘Recent Developments in Housing Law’ , Edwards Duthie and Liz Davies for the case.Lappin v Surace Romford County Court 13 June 2012Ms Surace was the assured shorthold tenant of Mr Lappin on a 12 month term to 19 April 2010. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:27 pm
Flagstar Bank, FSB (4D10-641) and Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm
Our thanks to Legal Action’s ‘Recent Developments in Housing Law’ , Edwards Duthie and Liz Davies for the case.Lappin v Surace Romford County Court 13 June 2012Ms Surace was the assured shorthold tenant of Mr Lappin on a 12 month term to 19 April 2010. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:01 am
Holahan case in FEC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 10:37 am
In Pannell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:10 am
Brown v. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:39 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: SC19286 - Davis v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 8:37 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: AC32883 - Davis v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
