Search for: "Doe Corporation" Results 1741 - 1760 of 51,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 6:35 am by Unknown
The proposal describes NACs as corporations whose primary purpose is to manage, maintain, restore, and grow the value of natural assets. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:12 am by Rob Robinson
Yet, the vast majority of court reporting firms employ outdated, sometimes decades-old technology that does not come close to meeting today’s data security requirements. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Sherica Celine
Generally, the IRS does this through bulk processing operations at facilities known as IRS Centers, under its authority to assess the taxes shown on returns. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
  Further, DABUS is not even a legal person (such as a corporation) and therefore cannot transfer rights. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
  The answer under California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 may surprise some. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Finally, antitrust does not grant relief unless the monopolizer has acted unjustly or illegally. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” … “The Consulting/Nomination Provision does not stop with the present nomination—or even AAUs about AIM. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:01 pm by Philip Segal
If the doctor owns the practice, what else does the doctor own? [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
The public does not and should not accept final answers to complicated questions on faith alone. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita; Does Enlightened Shareholder Value add Value? [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita; Does Enlightened Shareholder Value add Value? [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:48 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
So, if an employee is classified as exempt under the administrative, executive or professional exemptions under state law, this ordinance does not apply to them. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am by Guest Author
In Macomber, the Court held that Congress could not tax a shareholder upon the receipt of a corporate stock dividend because it did not represent a change in the shareholder’s economic interest in the corporation. [read post]