Search for: "Doe v. Holder" Results 1741 - 1760 of 6,694
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
The CJEU took on this question early this month, and handed down a decision that has prompted a great deal of discussion in the general public.The case of Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff concerned a photograph taken by Mr Renckhoff. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
” The decision does not mention Burford abstention or otherwise indicate if the defendants argued Burford abstention as an alternative basis for dismissal. [read post]
In a blow for rights-holders, the UK Supreme Court has today decided that ISPs should not bear the implementation costs for website blocking orders in Cartier International AG & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2018] UKSC 28. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:20 am by Brett Trout
While 2018 does not appear to be on track to surpass the record-breaking number of patent lawsuits filed in 2013, this massive jury award in IBM v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:45 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
” Under the plain meaning of the statute, Balkind, as the holder of 49% of the voting stock, does not have standing, and New York courts strictly interpret and apply the statute. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
” Under the plain meaning of the statute, Balkind, as the holder of 49% of the voting stock, does not have standing, and New York courts strictly interpret and apply the statute [citations omitted]. [read post]