Search for: "Does 1 - 39" Results 1741 - 1760 of 5,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
R.S. 39:1538 does not mention dismissal as a penalty, one could have read the statute as supplemental to the prohibitions in La. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
  It does not include lost opportunities, disincentives to innovation, the inability to raise money due to the decrease in collateral, and the loss of jobs without those investments. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1]  (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, Respondents have served subpoenas identical to that here on at least 39 other Dominion customers. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:06 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Note that the purpose of this lecture series is to introduce readers to the subject and therefore, this lecture does not critically examines the Award insofar as the FET standard is concerned but would only provide a descriptive comment.Lecture 19: Introduction to Full Protection and Security StandardThis lecture introduces the full protection and security standard. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:12 am by husovec
The reasoning behind the suspicions is not public (and unlikely to be disclosed pending the investigation) but the press release shows that the Commission suspects that X might be violating the following provisions: Article 16(5/6) [submission interfaces & handling of illegal content notices], Article 25(1) [potential misleading character of blue checkmarks], Article 39 [the failure to implement proper ad archives], Article 40(12) [failing to allow accessibility of public data… [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:16 pm
While the definition of “trade secret” of Article 2 remains the same as the Commission’s proposal (which in turn reflects Art. 39 of TRIPs), one of the most sensible Council amendments concerns the scope of violation of a trade secret. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:46 pm
  This is from the 8th Book of Madrigals, p. 39 in the Dover score. 12. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:11 am by tekEditor
This is Facebook's response to the call for expressions of interest in HTTP/2.0: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2CfI 1. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:39 pm
The IRS, however, does not accept these as they prefer to receive these requests through hand delivery or mail. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“[A] party’s unilateral belief does not confer upon him or her the status of client. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:59 pm
Fortunately, Federal Reserve regulations that will go into effect on July 1, 2010, will largely eliminate this practice, but until then, we're still in the world where the credit card companies can change the deal they made with you. [read post]