Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2016, 12:01 pm
Voters approved the question, with 61 percent voting in favor and 39 percent voting against. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:57 am
Ultimately, upon review of the final ID, the Commission determined that a violation of section 337 had been shown based on infringement of claims 1-4, 6, 8-11, 13, 15-16, 35-37, 39, and 41-46 of the ’809 patent. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
Claim 1 refers to a range of average particle sizes without indicating which type of average is to be taken or by which method it is to be determined.Hence, for a given particle size distribution, the average particle size determined by one method may be within the range indicated in claim 1 whereas it may be outside said range when determined by another method. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:01 pm
Voters approved the question, with 61 percent voting in favor and 39 percent voting against. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:34 am
That decision led the parties to jointly stipulate to dismiss Doe's civil action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), thereby mooting the case. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
Potential solutions to come out of the day included: 1. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
. __, 758 S.E.2d 39 (2014), in which the court of appeals ruled that an officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop a pedestrian who engaged in what the officer viewed as suspicious and evasive behavior. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:24 pm
Why Does This Matter? [read post]
Non-Signatory Shareholders Bound to Agreement; Court Cannot Waive Contractual Fee-Shifting Provision
25 Sep 2010, 10:57 pm
The only contestable issue was privity, but res judicata does not require a direct contractual relationship. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
In issues two through four, Doggett argues that The Travis Law Firm cannot recover attorney’s fees from a prior lawsuit as actual damages because (1) the Texas Supreme Court has not adopted an equitable exception to the general rule regarding attorney’s fees; (2) an attorney representing himself does not incur attorney’s fees; and (3) The Travis Law Firm was not a prevailing party in the prior lawsuit. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
Finally, as to the third preliminary question, AG takes that view that Article 18(1) TFEU does not apply to a situation in which the addressee of a judicial document has waived his (her) right to refuse service of that document in accordance with Article 8(1) of the Service Regulation (point 101). [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:38 am
United States, 206 F.3d 731, 737-39 (7th Cir. 2000).) [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Patten LJ has an enormous amount of ground clearing to do on estoppel by acquiescence and does it with some aplomb. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Patten LJ has an enormous amount of ground clearing to do on estoppel by acquiescence and does it with some aplomb. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
(See, e.g. id., Ex. 39.) [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:07 am
This statement of the law was approved by the Court of Arches in Re Bentley Emmanuel Church, Bentley [2006] Fam 39 at [26]. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 1:55 am
To be sure, households do benefit from other federal programs such as national defense, highway spending, and public education, but CBO does not include the benefits of such programs in this exercise. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The DOI explained that ICWA requirements would apply to an action that may result in one of the placement outcomes, even if it ultimately does not. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
" Three major approaches are considered: 1. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:10 pm
That reaction is to say that a DS child'snparents' wish that more DS children be born is a a bit like a parent'snwish that other children be sick like her child is. [read post]
