Search for: "Does 1-51" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2017, 10:03 am by Symone Mazzotta
The Miranda warning is born 51 years ago today On this day, Congress approved the 14th Amendment [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Daniel Taskalis
Wells Electronics applied: the on-sale bar is triggered where before the critical date (1) there is a sale or an offer for sale and (2) the claimed invention was ready for patenting. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Wells Electronics applied: the on-sale bar is triggered where before the critical date (1) there is a sale or an offer for sale and (2) the claimed invention was ready for patenting. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 11:49 pm by Sander van Rijnswou
In view of this new citation, it appears to be appropriate to remit the case to the department of first instance (Article 111(1) EPC 1973, see also Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition, IV.E.7.2.2).OrderFor these reasons it is decided that:1. [read post]
  The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
  The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
  The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
  The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:27 am
Wells Electronics applied: the on-sale bar is triggered where before the critical date (1) there is a sale or an offer for sale and (2) the claimed invention was ready for patenting. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 10:14 am by Jeff Rasansky
” While the new law includes a provision to preempt local texting-and-driving ordinances, as written, it does not address stricter cell phone bans (i.e., hands-free laws) put in place by at least 45 Texas cities such as Austin, Denton, and San Antonio. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm by Lisa Gilbert
The truth is that Congress does not need the CRA to repeal a regulation. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
Introduction Sovereign conduct at the margins of the law, the title of the Symposium for which this essay was produced,[1] is perhaps no better manifested than in the commercial activities of states. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:27 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Moreover, I stay within the Guidelines nearly 51% of the time. [read post]