Search for: "Does 1-80" Results 1741 - 1760 of 6,386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 am by Robert Liles
  The fraud was widespread, and more than 80 search warrants were executed in 17 Federal judicial districts. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am by Roel van Woudenberg
"1.3 In comparison to above claim, claim 1 of the main request has been amended as follows:"1. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Oct. 332/1 Degas was not exaggerating when he revealed his dancers to have been a depressingly dog-faced bunch.Here's that Vanity Fair article about Degas's unpleasant-looking ballerinas. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Many states allow 20 years, and at the federal level, the years are unlimited while the amount is limited to 80 percent of tax liability. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am by Keith Mallinson
Why should the value of IP versus hardware in a smartphone be limited to such small percentages of its purchase price when the corresponding percentages for IP in music CDs, video DVDs, software CD ROMs or patented pharmaceuticals are more like 80 percent? [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 11:09 am by Amanda Sloat
The House of Lords—where Johnson does not have a majority—dealt the government its first legislative defeat by backing five amendments on January 21. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:14 am
In Pleggenkuhle, husband and wife purchased 80 acres of farmland from the husband’s grandparents and his parents provided a $50,000 gift to help finance the building of a new house on that land. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 9:26 am by skelly
Below, we highlight what we view as the top 10 of these legal and regulatory changes. 1. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Addressing a procedural matter, the court noted that "the fact that a determination is final for the purpose of its present execution does not mean it is final for judicial review purposes. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Addressing a procedural matter, the court noted that "the fact that a determination is final for the purpose of its present execution does not mean it is final for judicial review purposes. [read post]