Search for: "Evans v. Evans" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
In so ruling the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court’s holding that Education Law §2560, which incorporates by reference General Municipal Law §50-k, and Education Law §3028, are not in conflict and should be read together and "applied harmoniously and consistently," citing Alweis v Evans, 69 NY2d 199. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
In so ruling the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court’s holding that Education Law §2560, which incorporates by reference General Municipal Law §50-k, and Education Law §3028, are not in conflict and should be read together and "applied harmoniously and consistently," citing Alweis v Evans, 69 NY2d 199. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:18 am by INFORRM
A declaration of falsity was made in the case of Salman Rushdie v Evans and others in 2008. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:09 pm by Söğüt Atilla
This finding, however, seems to contradict a previous decision of the German Supreme Court in Drei-Streifen-Kennzeichnung (I ZR 21/98), in which a pattern consisting of two stripes (as opposed to adidas’ three stripes) had been found to be infringing due to adidas’ significant reputation.Katfriend Kimberley Evans (Pearce IP) analysed the Federal Court of Australia’s decision in FanFirm Pty Limited v Fanatics, LLC. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:46 am by Jeff Mitchell
That said, relying heavily on the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Evans v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Evans as a single joint expert and/or in permitting Mr. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Evans as a single joint expert and/or in permitting Mr. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
  Nevertheless, there was a development in Cambridge University Press, et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:12 pm
Randolph Evans, a partner at McKenna Long & Aldridge who heads the firm's financial institutions practice and handles legal malpractice and ethics issues, said, "There is a duty not to knowingly transmit information that you know is false. [read post]