Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 1741 - 1760 of 30,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
Connecting the precariousness of immigration status to the impact it has on the protection it affords to private life in the art 8 proportionality balancing exercise, he held that: … The more that an immigrant should be taken to have understood that their time in the host country would be comparatively short or would be liable to termination, the more the host state is able to say that a fair balance between the rights of the individual and the general public interest in… [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
"   As a result of the Court's decision, state attorneys general throughout the country may now seek to enforce their states' fair lending laws against national banks, creating a scenario in which banks could potentially be subject to conflicting laws in different states. [read post]
  The extent to which the law can be regarded as fair PAL has been criticised as unfair on a number of grounds. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
SIDES Opinion of the Court – 4 – competency to proceed in this trial, would that be a fair statement? [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:43 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
In a good day for fair jury selection in the State of California, the California Supreme Court reversed a conviction in a criminal case where a prosecutor used 10 out of 16 peremptory challenges to bump Hispanics off of the jury pool. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:43 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
In a good day for fair jury selection in the State of California, the California Supreme Court reversed a conviction in a criminal case where a prosecutor used 10 out of 16 peremptory challenges to bump Hispanics off of the jury pool. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Beth Hillman
Yesterday’s program at the Rhodes Conference on military jurisdiction saw more debate on the wisdom and practicality of civilian v. military jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the leading majority judgment Lady Hale stated that, following the well-established justification test, the criterion had to be considered in light of whether it has a legitimate aim to which it was rationally connected, and whether there was no less intrusive measure that could have been used instead after a fair balance had been struck between the rights of the individuals concerned and the interests of the community. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court made this ruling in a 7-2 decision in the case of Jerman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:06 pm
As is well known, the House of Lords in Stack v. [read post]