Search for: "FRANCE v. STATE" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:44 pm by Eric Goldman
The case eventually sputtered in court, but many Americans resented that France would tell us in the United States what was culturally appropriate for our country. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:26 am
From his tremendous Erasmus experience this Kat recalls that the same principle applies in the lovely jurisdiction of France, where it is for the national judges to determine the content of foreign law in French proceedings. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Tim Edgar
Henry V’s claim to the throne of France is “as clear as is the summer’s sun,” explains the Archbishop of Canterbury in Shakespeare’s play. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am by Amy Howe
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next month’s oral arguments in the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:45 am by Kevin
Here's the complete list of countries to which the Book Depository says it will ship for free: A - Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Aruba, Australia, Austria B - Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bermuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Brunei Darrusalam, Bulgaria C - Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, China, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Comoros, Cook Islands, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic D - Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic E… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:23 am
Western, Levels of Linkage: Across-Agreement versus Within-Agreement Explanations of Consensus Formation among States Non-State ActorsBryan R. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:06 am by Ben
Courts in the UK, Belgium and France have all granted blocking orders and in UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH und Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft GmbH the Advocate General's opinion was that Member States are to ensure that copyright holders or holders of related rights are able to apply for an injunction against intermediaries (including ISPs) whose services are used by a third party to infringe their rights that a specific blocking… [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
McCutcheon v. the Federal Election Commission seeks to eliminate the ceiling on what wealthy individuals can donate to federal candidates, parties, and PACs in a two-year election cycle. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm by Buce
 No, not de Gaulle, but his "allies," in this case the President of the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 6:18 am by Anne Foster
  The study concludes that the United States experienced the highest average total cost of a data breach at more than $5.4 million (compared to nine other countries, including Germany, the United Kingdom, and France, where privacy laws are generally considered stricter than those in the U.S.), and that the healthcare industry had the highest per capita data breach cost at $233 per compromised record, compared to a consolidated average among all countries of $136 per record. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Ritika Singh
Rozina Ali, senior editor at the Cairo Review of Global Affairs, has an op-ed in Al Jazeera America about the recent Hassan v. [read post]