Search for: "Fee v. United States"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 6,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2020, 2:40 am
EPA (Cultural Resources; Trust Relationship) United States v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
The oral argument yesterday morning in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:05 pm
After Kelo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 5:01 am
In Murphy et al v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
Under the terms of the agreement, Joan Frank agreed to pay the plaintiff a ‘‘ ‘staging fee’ ’’ in the amount of $19,000, which represented a nonrefundable ‘‘ ‘initial payment’ ’’ due ‘‘prior to the delivery and installation’’ of the furnishings. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
In an earlier post, I discussed some of the constitutional issues involved in ACLU v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:58 pm
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 33 (Mar. 6, 2007) on the case In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation, --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 528044 (6th Cir. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:38 am
The case, Tomick v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:09 am
United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994). [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:27 am
Supreme Court just explained in Commil United States, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
§ 1915(b)(2), caps the monthly exaction of filing fees at 20% of the prisoner's monthly income regardless of the number of cases or appeals for which he owes filing fees. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:15 am
In the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:08 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas had already decided the case against Conti for lack of antitrust standing and for the deficiencies of its Sherman Act theories.Thales needs to seriously think about whether its Munich case is worth pursuing at all. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 12:26 pm
Jacobson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
LUCINDA VINE; KRISTY POND, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants.No. 16-50847.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed May 19, 2017.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:16-CV-31.Before: BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]Appellants PLS Financial Services, Inc., and PLS Loan Store of… [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:48 am
., LLC v. [read post]
