Search for: "Good v. Associated Students" Results 1741 - 1760 of 1,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
Earlier this month, retired Justice John Paul Stevens sat down with one of his former clerks, Stanford law professor Jeffrey Fisher, for an interview. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
So, in addition to relying on good old common sense — where else could the fentanyl have come from? [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
Tucker is an associate professor of law at Drexel University’s Thomas R. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
The two debated whether the depiction of blood on the cover was in good taste. [read post]
Sweitzer Professor of Law; Todd Venook, a fellow at the Rhode Center; and Diego Zambrano, associate professor of law. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
Clustering is based on a new conceptual model developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) nicknamed FRBR. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:04 am by Rory Little
  Thus, thankfully, there is still some fertile ground for hypotheticals with which we practicing law professors can bedevil our students. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
Hutchinson, a professor and associate dean at the University of Florida School of Law. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
National Student Marketing Corporation Stanley Sporkin began his crusade for gatekeeper liability over 40 years ago, way back in 1977, during the prime of his SEC enforcement director tenure, in an SEC enforcement action against the National Student Marketing Corporation (NSMC). [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm by Bruce Boyden
” I tell my students they should see dollar signs when they hear that phrase, at least if they are billing by the hour, but other attorneys have told me what they hear is, “Run away! [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  The problem, obviously, is defining exactly what legal fidelity entails, to which I will turn presently, but there is a good reason that almost no one argues in public for the notion that anyone taking an oath of loyalty to the Constitution should be indifferent to ascertaining its meaning and then, if feasible, conforming with that meaning. [read post]