Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 7,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 1:43 pm
Cantanella's suing the State Bar of California over putting his disciplinary record, and a summary of the underlying offenses, online. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 8:32 am
In 1993, the California Court of Appeals, in Juge v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:39 pm
California’s Department of Industrial Relations FAQ on California overtime provides a good overview of the overtime requirements under California law. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
United States, 30 Fed. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:18 am
Does Text Spam Class Action Against Jiffy Lube Moves Forward – In re Jiffy Lube Int’l, Inc., Text Spam Litigation California Appeals Court Says Emails That Don’t Identify Sender Violate State Spam Statute – Balsam v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 8:33 pm
The case is City of Ontario v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:08 am
Brod v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:25 pm
Burnham v Public Employees' Retirement Sys. (2012) 208 CA4th 1576 John Burnham had a pension through the California Public Employees' Retirement System (Cal PERS). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:57 am
Monterey County was good—or applied the law in a manner consistent with preemption doctrine in California (although, as one author of a 2022 amicus brief on behalf of local governments, I’m admittedly biased). [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
In South Carolina State Board of Dentistry v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
Volusia CountyDiebold v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:21 am
Clark International Limited v. [read post]
Will the United States survive the 2016 election (and 2017 Inauguration of Donald Trump)? Continuing
22 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Tomorrow I shall teach Prigg v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:08 pm
” After the Court defined rest periods, it turned to the California Supreme Court’s opinion in Augustus v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:05 am
LEXIS 50028 (ED CA, May 9, 2011), a California federal magistrate judge recommended denying an inmate's claim in a habeas corpus proceeding that he was required by state officials to participate in a faith-based AA/NA program as a condition of parole. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
District Court for the Northern District of California 1999).Uber Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
