Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 6:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Linda Greenhouse has an interesting column on then-Supreme Court clerk Elena Kagan’s cert memo for Justice Thurgood Marshall on whether to accept cert in DeShaney v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:40 am by Matthew Scarola
Quon and New Process Steel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:47 am by Dan Ernst
Linda Greenhouse’s column in the New York Times, A Second Chance for Joshua, provides a fascinating view of the decision to grant cert in DeShaney v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:00 am by laborprof lpb
Steven Greenhouse has an article in the New York Times Thursday about a new development in the Dukes v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:54 am by Barco Reference Librarian
The New York Times reports that the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has been forced to dismiss Comer v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:08 am by rtruman
With 8 Appeals Court Judges Recusing Selves, Energy Companies Win Dismissal of Katrina Greenhouse Gas Suit :: Order and Dissents in Comer v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am by Erin Miller
EPA, ruling that the EPA could regulate greenhouse gases and that Massachusetts could sue the EPA for failing to do so, is the most important environmental decision in a generation. [read post]
31 May 2010, 7:36 am by Carter Wood
Fifth Circuit of Appeals found itself without a quorum for en banc consideration of Comer v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Greenhouse owner wants a robot to tend flowers to save space; shows the manufacturer how to make it. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:05 pm by Joe Koncelik
The legislative activity stems from the Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:46 pm by Joe Koncelik
Greenhouse Gas Regulation Commences January 2, 2011 without Legislation On May 13, 2010, EPA finalized its regulatory approach for control greenhouse gases (GHGs) from large stationary sources. [read post]
19 May 2010, 9:34 am
" The coalition is concerned that stationary sources could be affected by the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program and Title V operating permits.In order to prevent this from happening, the coalition would like to see Congress pass a disapproval resolution that "will effectively veto the EPA's scheme to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases as pollutants. [read post]