Search for: "HILL v. HILL" Results 1741 - 1760 of 7,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2015, 2:41 am by Amy Howe
Coverage and commentary continue to focus on King v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
in legal malpractice litigation.Gamiel v Curtis & Riess-Curtis, P.C. ,2007 NY Slip Op 07341 ,Decided on October 4, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department  "Plaintiff's affidavit was conclusory (see Murray Hill Invs. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 305 AD2d 228, 229 [2003]), and failed to set forth the requisite "but for" causation with respect to her legal malpractice claims (see Aquino v Kuczinski,… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
At PrawfsBlawg, Jessie Hill has this post, the last in a three-part series, entitled "Overruling Roe v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:01 pm
Cal. 2007) 2007 WL 2990281 (defendant ordered to disclose class members' contact information after an "opt-out" notice given); and Hill v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
"Reasonableness review" under the abuse of discretion standard is a steep hill to climb for a sentence vacation and remand.Musladin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:27 pm
Neugebauer's findings using the evaluation scheme propounded by Sir Austin Bradford Hill, a well-known epidemiologist and biostatistician. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:55 am
Sometimes even a single line in the middle of a lengthy opinion can stand out and strike me as obviously -- and dangerously -- wrong.Like here.The per curiam opinion (joined only by Judges Ferris and Gould) says a lot of things I agree with. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 4:35 pm
"Here, via the ILB, is the 36-page opinion in Cherry Hill Vineyards v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 am by sally
Supreme Court London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (23 February 2011) Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Daley- Murdock, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161 (23 February 2011) Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162 (23 February 2011) Berezovsky v Abramovich [2011] EWCA Civ 153 (23 February 2011) 007 Stratford… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:14 am by Kali Borkoski
On March 25, the Justices will hear oral arguments in Sebelius v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:17 am by INFORRM
  He relied on the 1891 decision of Pullman v Hill, which involved the plaintiff’s clerk opening a letter intended only for him. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Hills and Ridges DoctrineOver the past year, one court addressed the issue of whether the Hills and Ridges Doctrine should be applied where a Plaintiff fell in an area that was covered by an awning or a canopy.In the case of Johnson v. [read post]