Search for: "High v State" Results 1741 - 1760 of 35,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 11:31 pm by INFORRM
The Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States SERAP v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
But to be effective these ought to focus on targeted states rather than on the modalities of leading state self-actualization. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
Eleven states currently have a damage cap on personal injury and general tort cases. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
Eleven states currently have a damage cap on personal injury and general tort cases. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
Eleven states currently have a damage cap on personal injury and general tort cases. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Case Commented On: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2022 ONSC 1303 (Can LII); 2023 ONCA 476 (CanLII) Intimate partner violence (IPV) takes many forms, all of which cause harm to survivors (who are disproportionately women and children). [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
The plot was fully revealed, however, when The New York Times published columns by Paul Krugman and Chris Sagers on April 18 and April 29, now more boldly asserting that “growing monopoly power is a big problem” and that “profits are at near-record highs” due to declining competition. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
  At the state level, agencies in Massachusetts, Texas, California, Indiana, and Oklahamoa had the top referring websites, though the city of Charlotte, NC was also high on the list. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by R. Scott Adams
The High Court unsurprisingly ruled against the plaintiffs, but not without a measure of sympathy on this point, stating  It is clear that a State such as New Zealand can have responsibilities to civilian populations during an armed conflict. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm by Joanna Powis and Jonathan Lord
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd,… [read post]