Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 1741 - 1760 of 1,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2010, 6:59 pm by Christopher J. Slottee
Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, 828 P.2d 745, 758 (Alaska 1992) superseded by statute on a different issue as stated in Petrolane Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:59 pm
Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, 828 P.2d 745, 758 (Alaska 1992) superseded by statute on a different issue as stated in Petrolane Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am by Broc Romanek
In ruling on no-action requests, the agency staff typically issues a one-page memorandum stating whether it concurs with any of the issuer's arguments. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  Hugh McIntyre of Freedom is My Nationality thinks it’s the right move (his nationality is Canadian, incidentally). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:44 am by Lisa Kennelly
Jay O'Keeffe: This summer, I had a good result in construction appeal, Dunn Construction Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm by Kevin Russell
We all know this was the case with Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Thermo-Ply (PATracer) Honeywell – Patentee appeals finding of patent invalidity under on-sale bar provisions of § 102(b): Honeywell v Nikon (PATracer) Nalco – Nalco appeals from grant of preliminary injunction against it from infringement patent directed to method of removing or transferring metals and/or amines from crude oil: Baker Hughes v Nalco (PATracer) Nutriset - Access to food now an IP issue? [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:43 am by Erin Miller
He filed more than 400 petitions, motions, and briefs in the Supreme Court of the United States, and orally argued 13 cases there, including Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]