Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 3:00 pm
In White, the husband and wife were married for 21 years before separating. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:01 am
Finally, the Tax Court upheld the imposition of a section 6662 accuracy-related penalty, pointing out, among other things, that the taxpayer had been advised to seek a tax professional’s opinion but that she did not introduce any evidence that she relied on professional tax advice.In the other case, Muniz v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” So held the Appellate Division, Second Department in its April 24, 2019 decision in Mizrahi v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:32 am
The Court of Appeals further held that Husband’s negligence in failing to read the agreement he executed did not preclude reformation, citing the case of Jumper v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 7:53 pm
In fact, the case is remanded for a determination of how much the ex-husband must now pay for the ex-wife's counsel fees. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:29 pm
In Gunkle v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 4:58 pm
There, the order prohibited a mother from disclosing negative information about her former husband's new wife to anyone except certain specified professionals. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
The mother and father are husband and wife. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 4:42 am
In Marc Headley v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:28 am
Plaintiff was decedent’s wife and mother of his two children. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
When husband and wife hold shares as joint tenants with right of survivorship, can one of them seek corporate dissolution without joining the other? [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In Fortgang v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:30 am
One case in particular, Sagonowsky v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:47 am
Justice Richard BernsteinYesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court, in one of Justice Richard Bernstein's first opinions, held that when a husband-wife medical marijuana operation is not conducted in strict accord with the Medical Marijuana Act, the wife, whose role was limited to assisting with the harvest schedule, is not afforded immunity under the MMA. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:37 am
Justice Richard BernsteinYesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court, in one of Justice Richard Bernstein's first opinions, held that when a husband-wife medical marijuana operation is not conducted in strict accord with the Medical Marijuana Act, the wife, whose role was limited to assisting with the harvest schedule, is not afforded immunity under the MMA. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm
The husband moved for summary judgment dismissing the wife's action. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
The Appeal The wife appealed the trial court’s decision dismissing her petition, arguing that the husband’s change in beneficiaries from wife to children violated the anti-hypothecation order and required the imposition of a constructive trust in favor of the wife over the proceeds. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:16 am
Facts: In January 2005 the family court ordered the former wife to "pay $25,000.00 toward [former husband's] attorney fees. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:42 am
Additional Resources: Easterling v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Quintal v. [read post]
