Search for: "In Re: CONTEMPT"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 3,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
We’re talking about dates, times, vacations, adjustments, and the base level particulars. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, supra. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
The Bench as well as the Bar has to avoid unwarranted situations or trivial issues that hamper the cause of justice and are in the interest of none.17) In the case of Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate, In Re: , (1998) 7 SCC 248, the advocate was charged of criminal contempt of Court for the use of intemperate language and casting unwarranted aspersions on various judicial officers and attributing motives to them while discharging their judicial functions. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Shortly after his arrest, and within the context of an application made by the police in relation to Mr Khuja’s property, magistrates made an under order under section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 3:08 pm
Substantive Due Process issues can arise if contempt issues occur in a divorce which become criminal in nature. [read post]
14 May 2024, 2:45 pm
The judge found him in contempt earlier this week and fined him $9,000. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 11:23 pm
[Re St. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:23 pm
We're talking about someone who has seemingly no concern with the horrors that system inflicts on people. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:56 am
The opinion we’re concerned with issued on April 7: U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
But today, we’re all one bad moderation call away from having our lives turned upside-down. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:27 am
"They're prepared to run that gauntlet? [read post]
14 May 2024, 9:52 am
Indeed, even as he was imposing his little fines after Trump predictably began to violate the order, the judge told Trump that he was giving the former President every opportunity to avoid being jailed for contempt: "Mr. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
“You’re gonna be sorry you ever met me. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 1:06 pm
The dissenting justices believed that the majority improperly re-weighed the evidence on appeal and would have found that Rule 803(4) issues were subject to abuse of discretion review, rather than the de novo review applied by the majority. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
The court’s approach is to apply the familiar balancing exercise described in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593; see, e.g., Re Al Maktoum (Reporting Restrictions Order) [2020] EWHC 702 (Fam); [2020] EMLR 17. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
We're going to walk down. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
You’re too late. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
You’re too late. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:06 am
If the judge had simply ordered him to remove his jacket, or cover the offending words, the judge probably would have been within his rights to hold Cohen in contempt, especially if the words on his jacket were disrupting the proceedings. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:42 pm
Remember judges have the power to hold people in contempt, which can mean fines, but generally is usually a public tongue-lashing in front of everyone in the courtroom. [read post]
