Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 9,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2014, 4:55 am
Make no mistake, this proposal is primarily designed to help labor unions win elections. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
The Texas Lawyers' Insurance Exchange offers two policy options to lawyers and judges in the state of Texas. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 1:51 pm
Drawing inspiration from well-known copyright and public domain works, as well as recent copyright litigation, the resource provides a springboard for exploring key principles and ideas underpinning copyright law and creativity, and the limits of lawful appropriation and re-use. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 3:09 am
In re Jeco, Inc., Serial No. 86972193 (October 18, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Anthony R. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:57 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark DATA ATOM for various computer services, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark ATOMIC DATA, in standard character and design form, for overlapping computer services. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
In re Fabtech Industries, Inc., Serial No. 86916673 (October 27, 2017) (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:48 pm
The judge will carefully consider all these aspects to make a fair and informed decision. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:50 am
Prosecutors and Judges often wonder why clients facing ten years in prison balk at a reduced offer of five or three? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
In re Hy-Vee, Inc., Serial No. 87120774 (February 6, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances Wolfson).Because the goods in the application and the cited registrations are identical in part, the Board must presume that they travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers.As to the marks, the Board found the word "piranha" to be the dominant portion of Applicant’s mark "because it is modified by the term 'peaceful' in… [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:40 am
In re Wella Operations US, LLC, Serial No. 97401927 (February 20, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert J. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:18 am
In re Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Serial No. 90263124 (March 11, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark Lebow). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:21 am
In re Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., Serial No. 87072333 (November 6, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein).During examination, the USPTO must analyze the specimens of use to determine whether the purported mark would be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:08 am
In re Apparatus LLC, Serial No. 86443209 (September 28, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances Wolfson).Mere Descriptiveness: Dictionary definitions led the Board to conclude that the term "apparatus" refers to "an item or a collection of items forming a unified whole to accomplish a single purpose. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
In re NKKK LLC, Serial No. 90100250 (April 25, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda A. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:04 am
Sadder is that we have all these great biographies by stellar (former) Chief Justices like:Brandieis and FrankfurterSuper Chief (Earl Warren)Justice Oliver Wendell HolmesLearned Hand's Courtand we're now, relegated to appointing judges who will make decisions that favor a particular political party. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 4:37 pm
It makes it harder to compete with tech companies by designing interoperable products. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:12 am
" In re Well Living Lab Inc., Serial No. 86440401 (June 7, 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Wolfson).Beginning with "lab" - defined as a "room or building equipped for scientific experiments, research ... [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:16 am
As such, re-use of the photo was allowed since. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 2:49 am
In re Super Salt, LLC, Serial No. 88143498 (July 22, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:11 am
In re Coscentra B.V., Serial No. 79196465 (March 26, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie).Of course, because the goods are in-part identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion. [read post]
