Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 1741 - 1760 of 30,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2023, 11:54 am by Eric Goldman
Case citation: In re Vital Pharmaceutical, 2023 WL 3689540 (S.D. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am by Frank Cranmer
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:00 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
A defendant must have aided and abetted (by knowingly providing substantial assistance) another person in the commission of the 4 TWITTER, INC. v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm by Bill Marler
 “When we perform our investigations, we’re really looking for a common source or exposure point,” she said. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
These provisions, placed today in Chapter V of the UPCA, include the definition of the patent’s owner prerogatives to prevent the direct and indirect use of the invention (Art. 25 and 26), the list of limitations concerning the scope of patent protection, including inter alia, acts done privately or for experimental purposes, the use of biological material for the purpose of breeding, discovering and developing other plant varieties (Art. 27), the condition of the right for prior use… [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
The ICO released a statement in response, stating that it does not share the views of the report. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
A critical case absent from the Supreme Court’s Amgen analysis is In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731 (Fed. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:14 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Furthermore, by that point, the children will be re-acclimated to life in Germany and to the care of Petitioner. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]