Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2018, 12:33 pm
The offer's silent on costs and fees, which automatically means they're added to the offer. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:25 pm
., trying to get inside, and then sitting on a bench in the back yard when you're unsuccessful? [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 3:46 pm
But the trial court says, sorry, you were the actual shooter, beyond a reasonable doubt, so you're not eligible for relief.At which point Mr. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 1:13 pm
., without access to the whole record -- sometimes you're at a disadvantage. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
You should not go onto the roof of a building when you're incredibly, incredibly high and rolling on the floor and the like.That said, I gotta say, I was struck by one critical fact in the opinion. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
But it also tells Villarreal:“When we purged the Arizona DUI and the suspension order last September, we did not anticipate that a renewal application would result in the conviction being re-reported and another suspension action being generated. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:40 pm
Everything I say that you dismiss is all the reasons you have motives already, and you're not willing to compromise. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 pm
Even in the guise of saying "Oh, sorry, we can't follow your order because we think you're wrong and she is, in fact, still a danger to herself or others, ergo no one will take her. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 6:03 pm
Even if we're pretty much (or entirely) certain, based upon facts outside the trial, that the guy's in fact guilty (e.g., that the mother here is over 18).That's not a pretty result. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:00 pm
You've got a totally vulnerable person, intellectually disabled, and you're getting her naked very week? [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
On the theory that teenagers arguing about deadly force was better than teenagers hitting a crack pipe, I took the call and explained the answer (at least in California) as best I could.Now I can tell them to just read today's opinion.Justice Raphael is technically talking about when it's permissible to brandish a weapon (rather than use it), but it's basically the same rule, since if you can't permissibly use a weapon, you're not allowed to brandish it… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:57 am
White, she re-ups the lease, and then she says she wants to leave early because she's bought a house, and he says, fine, though you'll still owe four months of rent if I'm not able to find someone to rent the place. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:14 pm
And that when the author says, as today's opinion does, that "We conclude the dissenting opinion is correct," that you're talking about yourself.Yeah. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:04 am
Regardless, IMHO, of whether you're for or against the residential development of hillsides. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 2:13 pm
"Yeah, you're going to be sentenced to death for that. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
Among other things, he was apparently a producer on the the 1984 film version of The NeverEnding Story -- or at least the names, which aren't totally common, are the same; I'm not actually vouching for whether they're the same person or not. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:01 pm
"My nonlegal mind reads that as saying that the bulk of the trust goes to whomever Father lists in his will, and if there's no such will, then an equal share goes to each of Father's kids (or at least that's the way it works if they're all still alive).Okay so far? [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 11:54 am
"Not exactly what you want to happen when what's at stake is whether you're going to be paralyzed for the rest of your life, eh? [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:35 am
But everyone would have saved time and money if a new counsel had been able to come in on appeal and say "Don't even bother raising a sufficiency of the evidence claim on appeal, since there's no way you're going to win. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:32 am
Finally, by "more time," we're talking about a fair piece of time in addition to the statutory 60 days. [read post]
