Search for: "In re: AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
Bahlul did ask a “legal question” about whether the “law here by you stems from the action, before action, or post action,” id. at 104, but the military judge could not ascertain what Bahlul was asking and Bahlul did not elaborate. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm
Take action now. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
The common-law principle on which Mr. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:49 pm
Norwegian-Americans have played an important role in the development of our country. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
If the “compelling interest” test is to be applied …, it must be applied across the board, to all actions thought to be religiously commanded. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Under U.S. leadership, the international community has endorsed these principles as well. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
New First Amendment principles for public employment? [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Barbara Green, co-founder of Hobby Lobby, said in a statement, “Today the nation’s highest court has re-affirmed the vital importance of religious liberty as one of our country’s founding principles. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Property rights also free sphere of private action. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:10 pm
Authorization by corporate owners and managers of criminal action makes them criminally complicit in that action. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
” In In re Directives, the FISC held that even where the foreign intelligence exception applies, the government action that intrudes on individual privacy interests must meet the Fourth Amendment reasonableness requirement. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:27 pm
Unfortunately, the wording of the House's USA FREEDOM Act could be seen as codifying these about searches—something we’re particularly concerned about. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
All records pertaining to communications between MSN . . . and any person regarding the account, including contacts with support services and records of actions taken. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:06 am
Hence, the case poses the issue that ought to allow the Supreme Court to re-examine the tolling rule ̶ from American Pipe & Constr. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
We’re happy to offer our idea free of charge to any pro-defense organization, such as the Chamber of Commerce or the American Tort Reform Association, that does engage in tort-related lobbying in Congress.We wish that such a statute were not necessary, but the unfortunate fact remains that, despite decisions by the Supreme Court and by all twelve federal courts of appeals (see here) that decide diversity matters, the existing Erie principle that courts… [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
So long as the military “controlled” the actions of the PMC, and review of those actions would thereby require review of the reasonableness of military decisions in a combat zone, both circuits concluded that the political question doctrine should apply. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
Equality is an explosive principle on the Roberts Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require. (2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance— (a) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:06 am
Greenwald and Poitras “vowed to each other repeatedly and to Snowden” that their actions would honour Snowden’s choice. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
For good reason, Americans want to understand the Court. [read post]
