Search for: "J. G." Results 1741 - 1760 of 8,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2013, 1:48 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
I review nine theories of civil liability: (a) battery, (b) informed consent, (c) negligence, (d) intentional infliction of emotional distress, (e) negligent infliction of emotional distress, (f) breach of contract, (g) health care decisions statutes, (h) POLST statutes, (i) Section 1983, and (j) the False Claims Act. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 8:30 am by Liisa Speaker
The evidence provided, concluded the MCOA, was sufficient to find the grounds for terminating her rights under Sec. 19b(3)(g) and (j). [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:57 am by NL
And as if by magic (thanks J) we have a transcript for the permission hearing judgment in Godfrey v A2 Dominion [2010] EWCA Civ 941, following our earlier note here. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:33 am by Yosi Yahoudai
In a statement released after that action in early April, Pomona College President G. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:33 am by Yosi Yahoudai
In a statement released after that action in early April, Pomona College President G. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 7:06 am
At least one source said many thought Cappy was waiting to see what happens to Justice Thomas G. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:18 am by GSU Law Student
Recently, the United States witnessed the inauguration of its 45th President – Donald J. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In that case, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that punitive damages may be awarded for conduct that is outrageous because of a Defendant’s reckless indifference to the rights of others.The court also relied upon comment g to §500 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which assists in defining reckless conduct. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:57 am by NL
And as if by magic (thanks J) we have a transcript for the permission hearing judgment in Godfrey v A2 Dominion [2010] EWCA Civ 941, following our earlier note here. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:46 pm
Interestingly, Sundberg J noted: 54. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  While Plaintiff tried to argue that the Court already did so based on factor (j)(2)(g), which is Defendant’s financial independence,  the Appellate Division did not buy it. [read post]