Search for: "Jacobs, in Re"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 1,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2007, 3:41 pm
Sometimes you can feel or even smell that you're definitely not on the page you wanted to visit. 2. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 1:21 am
Yet rather than battle it out in court, Intel is trying to put the brakes on the proceedings by using a relatively new government process -- inter partes re-examination -- that's becoming an increasingly popular way for accused infringers to get patents invalidated. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:59 am
Jacob Loshin has an interesting draft paper on intellectual property among magicians. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 9:50 am
Touro College’s Jacob D. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 11:41 am
Not at all, says the Bio Job Blog's Cliff Mintz in his criticism of this article by Wall Street Journal blogger Jacob Goldstein. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 5:58 am
The difference between "watching a commercial on a Web site and in your living room," said Michael Jacobs, executive vice president and executive creative director at MRM Worldwide in New York, is that online is "an opt-in audience; you're choosing to be there. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm
We hope to look for birds while we’re up there. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:39 am
The Board sustained the opposition.TTABlog further comments: Although the Board distinguished Jacobs on its facts, it failed to deal with In re Coors Brewing Co., 68 USPQ2d 1059 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 2:57 pm
"The people out of law school have these huge loans," Jacobs said. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:20 am
They're taking any bit of green space and putting a bench there. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:32 pm
(Alaska's lead is so pronounced as to suggest they're including offenses that other states discreetly disregard.) [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 12:24 am
If Jacobs is right on the merits, then it shouldn't matter whether the College Voice is the work of H.L. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 2:01 pm
Jacobs' Esquire piece, I Think You're... [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:50 pm
The consensus in the conference was that the debate will not be re-opened, and that there is no need for more legislation, or to resurrect the failed Directive. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
” But UCLA’s Professor Bainbridge thinks Jacobs took the case very seriously, quoting Molière: “One easily bears moral reproof, but never mockery. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
Molière wrote:One easily bears moral reproof, but never mockery.Knowing this, I suspect, Chief Judge Jacobs intentionally set out to use the technique known as shaming. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:49 pm
In "I Think You're Fat", an article from the July issue of Esquire, he describes his experiment in Radical Honesty and its impact on his work and personal life. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
We're warning you, if you're not a lawyer, then you'll find this post very boring. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:53 am
Jacobs (In re Jacobs), No. 06-15333, 2007 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:39 am
Among the speakers was Lord Justice Jacob, who gave a paper entitled "The Judge's Perspective", the subject of the perspective being the resolution of Europe's horrendous patent litigation problems.It is rare for the IPKat to post an entire document of this length; it is even rarer for the Kat to withhold his comments. [read post]
