Search for: "John R. Held" Results 1741 - 1760 of 7,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
The court has just said “generally no,” in an opinion written by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:31 pm by Miriam Seifter
Going one step further (and arguably a bit beyond the question presented), the court then held that, on the facts of this case, no taking had occurred. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
”   Document 2: Memorandum Opinion and Order, Judge Bates This memorandum opinion and order from Judge John D. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background John Reid founded and was Chairman and CEO of Capitol Bancorp, which owned community banks in seventeen states. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
John McCain (R-AZ) suggested that any Americans wishing to travel to North Korea should have to sign a waiver recognizing the risks they are assuming. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:31 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Instead, we remember him for his magisterial four-volume biography of Chief Justice John Marshall, The Life of John Marshall. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:36 am by Patricia McConnico
Above from left to right: Crystal Fletcher, Carolyn Cadena, Mary Rios, Sarah Kelly, Justice John Phillip Devine, Justice Don R. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:36 am by Patricia McConnico
Above from left to right: Crystal Fletcher, Carolyn Cadena, Mary Rios, Sarah Kelly, Justice John Phillip Devine, Justice Don R. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm by Lovechilde
Kamala Harris (D-Bad Ass) tried to pin him down on the existence of this policy, he claimed he was too nervous to answer the question and had to be bailed out by John McCain (R-Old White Man), who scolded Harris for being too tough on his friend.Sessions also relied on an indefensible interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]