Search for: "Keys v. State" Results 1741 - 1760 of 20,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am by Fenella Keymer, Olswang LLP
  The contract expressly stated that the relationship between the parties was that of client and independent contractor. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am by Matthew Wentworth-May
Lord Sumption rejected this, stating that the directives leave various matters to member states to determine, but the domestic schemes were nonetheless part of a scheme for implementing an EU tax. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:15 am by Danny Glover
In this post, we’ll break down some the key elements of North Carolina’s felony stalking law, using State v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:33 am by Joanne Zimolzak
  Manageability is key to the political question doctrine analysis. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:16 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm by Florian Mueller
The states--led by the Beehive State--are (in alphabetical order): Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, D.C. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:41 am by hlpronline
If such an order were issued, Texas would become the first state to be subject to preclearance in the post-Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court said that in its reaching that conclusion it expressed "no view on whether any of the Diocese's defenses are meritorious" and "the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to that Court with direction to remand to DHR for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion".* The Court of Appeals' decision noted the "ministerial exception is a doctrine grounded in the First Amendment to the Constitution of… [read post]