Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 156,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2021, 9:38 am
The post On the right to testify in Graves v US first appeared on Koehler Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:54 am
R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2008] UKHL 63; [2008] WLR (D) 00; [2008] WLR (D) 328 “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within art 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms but it was lawful as… [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:30 pm
Maggie Blackhawk (University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) has posted "On Power & the Law: McGirt v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 12:06 am
United States, the Sixth Circuit's new decision that largely rewrites the law of e-mail privacy. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:24 am
State of New York (1st Dept., decided 4/29/2010) In Lang v Hanover Ins. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:46 am
“Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm
In March 2019, three Texas lawyers sued the State Bar of Texas claiming that under Janus v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:55 pm
In its second opinion of the term, CAAF today reversed the Army CCA in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:34 am
United States [Cornell LII Backgrounder; oral arguments transcript; JURIST report] that a private individual can challenge whether a federal criminal law passed to implement an international treaty is valid under the Tenth Amendment [text]. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:54 pm
Second, may the federal government treat as null for federal law a state-created legal status affecting family relations? [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:20 am
In the case of Kansas v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:52 am
State Farm. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:44 pm
The conference is jointly organised by Harvard Law, Yale Law and Trinity and Nanyang Technological Universities. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 7:32 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 9:13 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday granted certiorari in Harris v. [read post]
