Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 45,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2006, 6:53 am
., claims Disney and toy company Mattel Inc. incorrectly used a similar trademark to its "Real Cars" line of collectible toy cars. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 10:09 am
Supreme Court Decision in Moore v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm
That happened to all three lawyers who appeared on Tuesday afternoon as the Court heard the case of Navarette v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 7:25 am
In Theresa Tailford, et al v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am
On October 15, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Teva v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Last month the First Judicial District Court of Appeal for Illinois reached its opinion in Ballard v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:39 am
There is no bright line rule for an age at which the Court should consider a child sufficiently mature. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
After the oral arguments in Twitter v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:26 pm
The case of Irving v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 4:11 am
In Case C-362/06 P Markku Sahlstedt and Others v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:12 am
In Henriquez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
Minerva Surgical, Inc. petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in September 2020 to consider the question “whether a defendant in a patent infringement action who assigned the patent, or is [next in line] with an assignor of the patent, may have a defense of invalidity heard on the merits. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 7:50 am
Compare how Pete Dunbar gets remembered in the F.3d.It's in a case that only tangentially mentions him, in the following line: "In March 1983, then-U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Rogers v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 5:54 pm
Plaintiff is an apparel company named Derek Andrew, Inc. that sells a high-end (read: expensive) clothing line called "Twisted Heart" at Nordstrom, Saks Fifth Avenue, and Neiman Marcus. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 4:16 am
Additional Resources: Roma v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 9:10 am
In this case (Klein v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:04 am
Authored by Steve Shardonofsky Earlier this year, we commented [here] that the Supreme Court agreed to review the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Sandifer v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:52 pm
Single words and subject lines in electronic messages are “content” protected by the Stored Communications Act—Optiver Australia Pty, Ltd. v. [read post]
