Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord… [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am
His argument was that there is a line of authority, of which Earl of Pomfret v Lord Windsor (1752) 2 Ves Sen 472 (28 ER 302) provides an example, in which a beneficiary goes into occupation as a tenant at will; a beneficiary who goes into occupation as a tenant at will and pays rent on a periodic basis becomes a periodic tenant. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm
This will be the first defamation case heard by the highest court since the decision of the House of Lords four years ago in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2006] UKHL 44). [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
Dittman v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:15 pm
J M v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
V. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:50 pm
469, he referred to the decision of the House of Lords in Jones v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:10 am
Lord Hughes gave the judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:32 am
By Craig JarvisLay v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:53 am
In upholding the first instance decision, Lord Justice Collins stated that the interests of justice were not confined to the interests of justice in England and that the international dimension of this case demanded a broader view.This judgment provides helpful commentary on the law and practice of confidentiality and privilege as applicable to arbitration proceedings and raises questions of considerable practical importance relating to national and international arbitration. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The PCC has published Lord Hunt’s contribution here. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Her predominant legal interest lies in the areas of state crime and international human rights. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
As recently as January 2010, Lord Rodger stated in In re Guardian News and Media Limited [2010] 2 WLR 325 that on the existing Strasbourg case law, a right to obtain any information which would not be otherwise available to a person “is not within the scope of Article 10(1)”. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes. [read post]
