Search for: "MILLER v. MILLER" Results 1741 - 1760 of 7,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm by Robert Wagner
by: Robert Wagner, intellectual property attorney at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:57 pm
Today, Justice Miller issued this opinion, the first line of which is: "David Bustamante (the victim) was shot and killed in the parking lot of an In-N-Out restaurant on Christmas Day in 2015. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
"and"We disagree with the dissent’s conclusion that Miller requires the trial court to make an individualized sentencing decision as to juvenile offenders before imposing a de facto LWOP sentence in a nonhomicide case. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 10:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the en banc petition materials: Viejas Band En Banc Petition Gila River Amicus Brief Suquamish Tribe Amicus Brief Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Amicus Brief Maxwell Response to En Banc Petition Maxwell Supplemental Authorities Letter The petition is still pending, but perhaps the Miller v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:56 pm by mtlawlibrary
Wessel DA 19-0727 2020 MT 319 Civil – Declaratory Judgment Miller v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm by National Indian Law Library
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/currentsct.htmlPetition for certiorari was denied in Miller v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:43 am by Robert Wagner
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 4:39 am by Ray Dowd
Dowd from West here   Find Ray Dowd at Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 6th Ed. 2011) by Raymond J. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
In March, the Justices agreed to hear the appeal of Henry Montgomery of Baton Rouge, who is seeking retroactive application of the Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
In Torre v County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 421, the Court of Appeals explained that the doctrine holds that "a position created by a legislative act must be abolished by a correlative legislative act. [read post]