Search for: "MURPHY V US" Results 1741 - 1760 of 1,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Becker and Murphy (1998) estimated that 30% of sexual offenders were sexually abused as children. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYTorts Player Did Not Assume Risk of Being Hit in Face With a Bat by Coach Demonstrating a Technique Murphy v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 4:01 pm
Didn't we already go through this over a decade ago with Dan Quayle and Murphy Brown ? [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 6:11 am
Murphy, over his allegedly "improper" letters to the publisher of the Boston Herald. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:06 am
The general perception in the legal community has been that they are tax free, a dangerous and incorrect perception post Murphy v IRS and there was no shortage of settlement brokers angling to write these cases on the false promise that they could be done so income tax free and under the protective umbrella of section 104 and section 130. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:20 pm
Murphy and his famous law still seem to be the order of the day. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Gregory ValenzaThe Daily Journal2 November 2007REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
One of the best published opinions regarding the executive exemption was Murphy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:00 pm
I was preparing to explore the theorizing that I and other bloggers did in the wake of Genrty that it would have implications for employment contracts in general, when I came across this footnote in the recent Murphy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 4:44 pm
Our most downloaded podcasts in LBN history are the Murphy v IRS cases so a full hour of discussion on the law, it's application and how to use the planning tools of the 468b trust and taxable settlement annuity ( non-qualified annuity contracts) will be of keen interest to settlement professionals and trial lawyers alike, as well as CPA's, tax lawyers and others struggling with how to handle this new flood of taxable cases. 3. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 4:02 pm
Rob is the acknowledged expert in the US in this area of the law and you won't want to miss his discussion on Murphy v IRS, taxable damage implications and how 468b trusts can and should be used to manage potential tax issues. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:46 pm
Nine specs were dismissed prior to the scheduled date of Colonel Murphy's Article 32 hearing (which Colonel Murphy subsequently waived).Interestingly, the Times article states that the larceny specs are unrelated to the licensure issues that formed the original core of the charges. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
   Hot on the heels of Gentry comes Murphy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Because the district court correctly held that this case sounds in contract and not in tort, we AFFIRM the holding of the district court. 07a0407p.06 2007/10/04 Murphy v. [read post]