Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 1741 - 1760 of 5,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2013, 9:16 am by Brian Fletcher
 A certificate presents, among other things, information concerning the holder, the list of goods and services and the designated Contracting Parties at the time of the international registration or its renewal. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:36 pm
Thanks to Mark Ross of Lawscribe for pointing out this opinion. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
Secondy, the form of Revillon's stick could not be a trade mark under Art. 2.1 of the same Convention, because a mark cannot be granted where the sign consists exclusively of a shape that gives 'a substantial value' to the goods. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 9:26 am
” S&C lands Mattingly: For those bank lawyers out there who long ago grew jealous of Rodge Cohen’s book of business, this might not come as good news: S&C announced last night that it’s nabbed J. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:40 pm
How do you build upon the strengths of the administrative people within your law firm – from the mail room to the C-level? [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Instead, the status quo was largely preserved by the somewhat unsurprising conclusion that marks being used as trademarks (i.e. source identifiers) will ordinarily be treated as such.The case is however an interesting reminder that the US differs from the EU in the fact that it has codified, through the Lanham Act, an express parody exclusion for trademark infringement, whereas in the EU the courts have had to navigate the slightly more nebulous concept of "due cause" (Article… [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 4:00 am
The production is a compatible SACD, which I heard only from the CD layer, on which the sound was quite good. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:00 am
P. 37(c) and 26(e)(2), and it noted that Grande made no claim that new information was discovered. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:29 am by Tim Sitzmann
The applicant’s primary defense was that its marks were a parody of the Yankees logo and stadium nickname, and therefore were protected by Section 43(c)(3) of the Lanham Act, which provides that: The following shall not be actionable as dilution by blurring . . . any fair use . . . of a famous mark by another person other than as a designation of source for the person’s own goods or services. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:07 am
(c) in any case, is it necessary that the proprietor of a trade mark should have his trade mark registered before he can begin to “acquiesce” in the use by another of (i) an identical or (ii) a confusingly similar mark? [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
December 28, 2010).Likelihood of Confusion: The Board (here) had found likelihood of confusion due to the identity of the marks and the relatedness of the goods, despite the sophistication of the purchasers. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:46 pm
One of them was marketed by Allergan under the BOTOX trade mark and they were both used to treat various muscle conditions.Issues arose concerning the validity of the patent in respect of two of its claims. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Su, Howrey LLP, East Palo Alto, CA When a person or firm falsely claims, marks, or otherwise misrepresents its goods or services as covered by patent or copyright, what are the ramifications for competition and consumer protection? [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:37 pm by Gabriel Saldana
Two months ago, a huge celebration marked the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT), the policy that allowed the military to treat gays and lesbians differently than heterosexual members of the armed forces. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:37 pm by Gabriel Saldana
Two months ago, a huge celebration marked the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT), the policy that allowed the military to treat gays and lesbians differently than heterosexual members of the armed forces. [read post]