Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 1741 - 1760
of 21,680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
Mark Walsh provided a view from the Courtroom for this blog. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
In that respect, the court noted (as also previously stated by the EUIPO) that, according to settled case-law, the application of Article 7(1)(c) of the EUTMR does not depend on the existence of a real, current or serious need to leave a sign free. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 11:54 am
There is no marking on the house. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
Purdum v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:41 pm
See Real Foods Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:28 am
By Mark V. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 pm
The ruling, G.G. v Gloucester County Sch. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court yesterday denied review in Ricks v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 pm
The ruling, G.G. v Gloucester County Sch. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:39 am
If the state wins, it would mark a break with decades of precedent that mostly favors the powers of the federal government and open a new era for 50 state regulators to play a bigger role. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:59 am
In Mark v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:59 am
In Mark v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Singer v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Singer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
But Doe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
Many observers—including Epic CEO Tim Sweeney—have marked this as an unmitigated loss for Epic. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
(Mark Tushnet has a post raising similar questions.) [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:17 pm
¶40 (quoting Bingham School v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:44 am
In 1993, in the case of Amaratunge v Sirimal, Justice Mark Fernando of Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court made a remark that remains relevant. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
TrueNorth Companies, L.C. v. [read post]
