Search for: "Matter of Kennedy" Results 1741 - 1760 of 4,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
The enduring hope is that race should not matter: the reality is that too often it does…. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
” Concern about Chevron was not entirely new for Justice Kennedy. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Prior to 2006, these cases involved employees who spoke out on matters of public concern, defined as any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:50 am by Ryan Migeed
Regardless of whether that view is correct as a matter of law or not, the architects of that invasion relied on instruments of international law to make their case for it. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Pleading Special Matters (a) Fraud; Mistake; Condition of Mind. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
Justice Kennedy’s opinion in Masterpiece Cakeshop makes a similar point. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:00 pm
I also think that killing animals for sport (or food, for that matter), is wrong. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:57 am by David Cole
As Justice Kennedy put it, “Our constitutional tradition stands against the idea that we need Oceania’s Ministry of Truth. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:36 pm by Brian Stull
As former Justice Anthony Kennedy famously observed: “Prisoners retain the essence of human dignity inherent in all persons. [read post]
30 May 2020, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Like in the way that Anthony Kennedy is an originalist. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by FHH Law
Catherine is a Vice President at DCI Group where she counsels clients in federal policy matters. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
In essence, agrees with Kennedy that Buono's earlier standing to sue is still in effect for this case.Yes.Yes.What remedy is Buono entitled to if he wins? [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar responded by referring to such testimony as mere "assertions," and emphasized that in the view of the United States obviousness is ultimately a matter of law, not fact. [read post]