Search for: "Michigan v. Long" Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
Disability Blog & Cases: CIGNA Group Insurance and Subsidiaries sued in Alabama, New York and Michigan for allegedly acting arbitrarily and capriciously in denying claims for long term disability benefits Recently, the CIGNA Group Insurance and its subsidiaries (CIGNA) faced a barrage of disability insurance lawsuits filed against the company and its subsidiaries across the country allegedly for denying long term disability (LTD) benefits by ignoring overwhelming… [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:22 am by Louis Rosen
  He defended penniless petty criminals, notorious Chicago gangsters, controversial labor leaders like Eugene V. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
   I figured I’d get around it by arguing that the prior panel hadn’t had the benefit of Michigan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:29 am by Kiera Flynn
” Discussing a recent decision by the Sixth Circuit which struck down a Michigan ballot measure that – among other things – banned racial preferences in public higher education, the Wall Street Journal observes that the “University of Michigan’s racial admissions preferences are back from the dead, but probably not for long. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
There are a number of United States Supreme Court cases that have addressed the issue, Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
(WIMS) Publishers of Michigan Waste Report, REGTrak, WIMS Daily & eNewsUSA E-Mail: info@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by Richard D. Friedman
That should not be read as requiring formality for a statement to be deemed testimonial, and footnote 3 of Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence, with the aid of language from her opinion for the Court in Michigan v. [read post]