Search for: "Nation v. Nation"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 56,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2015, 5:13 am
(See Black Acres Pure Trust v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:42 am
Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:53 am
In Holland v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:00 am
Nicholas Paleveda (CEO, National Pension Partners; Adjunct Professor, Northeastern Graduate Tax Program), The Cain Plan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:51 am
Last week I wrote about the decision of the Supreme Court in Bullcoming v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
Circuit’s June 8 order, SNB and the non-profits urge the Supreme Court to grant the petition “to resolve the conflict” between PHH and the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
30 Nov 1998, 10:00 pm
v. [read post]
30 Nov 1998, 10:00 pm
v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 11:25 am
Newsom and Harvest Rock Church v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Alliance for the Wild Rockies (AWR) v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:17 am
Here: 17 NNOGC Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief 17-1 NNOGC Amicus Brief 17-2 Exhibits A-D 17-3 Exhibits E-O 17-4 Exhibits P-T 19 Navajo Nation Motion to Intervene 20 Navajo Nation Motion to Dismiss 21 NNOGC-Begay-DKT-0021-000 Defs Response in Opp to Plfs App for TRO and OSC-Filed 7-2-14 21-1 NNOGC-Begay-DKT-0021-001 Exh A-C to Defs Response in Opp to Plfs App for TRO and OSC-Filed 7-2-14 Complaint and motion for TRO posted here. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Starbucks’ favor in Starbucks v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
Supreme Court decision in New Process Steel v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:29 am
European Commission v Italian Republic (Case C-565/08); [2011] WLR (D) 118 “Mandatory national provisions obliging lawyers to comply with maximum tariffs, in all cases where there was no conditional fee agreement or no special agreement between lawyer and client, were not contrary to articles 43EC and 49EC of the EC Treaty. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:58 am
ZT (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “When a claim for asylum had been rejected as clearly unfounded under section 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, and the claimant made further submissions, the Secretary of State for the Home Department had to consider whether those further submissions created [...] [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:51 am
Vicente Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA; Case C-277/08 Court of Justice of the European Communities “National provisions or collective agreements which provided that a worker who was sick during a period of scheduled annual leave did not have the right, after his recovery, to take his annual leave at another time were unlawful. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:09 am
R (Low) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 35 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 15 “A worker, who was a national of a non member state, sent by a service provider exercising its freedom to provide services pursuant to art 49 EC, from one member state to another had to be lawfully resident [...] [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:08 am
(HR) (Portugal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Time spent in jail in the United Kingdom by a national of the European Economic Area was not counted when calculating whether he had live in the country continuously for at least ten years before the decision to deport him. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:22 am
Plaintiffs in Spittler and Farnham v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “In order to maintain the freedom of movement or EC workers, the Department of Work and Pensions was obliged to treat a dependent family member of an EU national, who retained his UK worker status, as living in Great Britain for the dependant’s eligibility for a United Kingdom pension credit. [read post]
