Search for: "Notice of Supplemental Authority" Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 2:56 pm
  The "free" service can be viewed by enforcement authorities as an illegal inducement for clinical services. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:05 pm by Dwight Sullivan
”  AFCCA didn’t notice that error when it reviewed the case without the benefit of counsel. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:40 am by Tomassi Law Associates
Public Adjusters The bill limits public adjuster fees related to reopened or supplemental claims to a maximum of 20 percent of the reopened or supplemental claim payment. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:40 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
This book, which assembles all the relevant EU legislation and ECJ decisions in one place, provides a guide to the maze of legal instruments now in place, supplemented by brief commentaries identifying the leading principles and anticipating future developments. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:44 pm by Lisa Law View
Payday Notice gives information regarding the employees’ payday. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:30 am
The Tenth Circuit observed that there is an ostensible split of authority as to whether a procedural defect in a notice of removal requires remand to state court. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 2(1) defines an offense as extraditable if the conduct on which the offense is based is punishable under the laws in both States by deprivation of liberty for a period of more than one year or by a more severe pen of offenses listed in the 1931 Treaty, obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as additional offenses become punishable under the laws in both States. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
(EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – ALJ Rogers issues initial determination in Certain Digital Imaging Devices and Related Software (337-TA-717) (ITC Law Blog) Apple – Apple, Nike motion to stay denied by Judge Wilken (WHDA) HTC – ALJ Bullock rules on motion to supplement notice of prior art in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (337-TA-721) (ITC Law Blog) Lodsys – Patent troll shakes down… [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Use of such a “dual criminality” clause rather than a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as additional offenses become punishable under the laws of both Contracting States. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Use of such a “dual criminality” clause rather than a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as additional offenses become punishable under the laws of both Contracting States. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The executive authority of the Requested State may refuse extradition for offenses under military law that are not offenses under ordinary criminal law. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Two days later, on April 29, 2011, the defendants filed a motion for leave to file a notice of supplemental authority. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Use of a pure “dual criminality” clause, rather than categories of offenses listed in the 1923 Treaty, obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as additional offenses become punishable under the laws in both States. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:54 am
The free probate forms cover the following items: DE-111 Petition for Probate DE-120(MA) Attachment to Notice of Hearing Proof of Service by Mail (Probate—Decedents’ Estates and Guardianships and Conservatorships) DE-120(P) Proof of Personal Service of Notice of Hearing—Decedent’s Estate or Trust (Probate—Decedents’ Estates) DE-120(PA) 7/1/2005 Attachment to Notice of Hearing Proof of Personal Service… [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Use of such a “dual criminality” clause rather than a list of offenses covered by the Treaty, as was the case in older treaties, obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as additional offenses become punishable under the law of both Contracting States. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Inclusion of a dual criminality clause without a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as offenses become punishable under the laws of both parties. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty should both States pass laws covering new types of criminal activity, such as computer-related crimes. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty should both States pass laws covering new types of criminal activity, such as computer-related crimes. [read post]