Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
Dismissing as entirely unhelpful the wealth of Western engagements with Chinese Marxist Leninist constitutionalism—precisely because eat their base this literature starts from the presumption of illegitimacy and the premise that constitutionalism and Marxism Leninism is an oxymoron (and thus tell us more about the state of Western self-conceptions than of the object studied)—most commentators on the rich and quite dynamic evolution of constitutionalism in China break… [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:31 pm
The issue of whether paying for sex or enjoying rough sex are defamatory is controversial judged by 2017 standards and raises difficult questions [46]-[48]. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:35 am
Board-Tech Electronic Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:52 pm
Held: “Reviewing de novo and applying the federal nexus standard established in Fowler v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
O’Connor v Bar Standards Board, heard 4 Oct 2017. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
Indeed, as the Court in Ivey noted, these were precisely the intentions of the Criminal Law Revision Committee report which proposed the use of the word “dishonestly” prior to the term’s entry into English law in the Theft Act 1968. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:54 am
In Ex parte McAward, the USPTO acknowledged that the BRI “standard differs from the claim interpretation standard used during patent litigation…. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:07 am
§ 702(a)(2), “Congress committed the use of § 1152(f) to the sole discretion of the President, such that a reviewing court has no manageable standard by which to evaluate it. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
” I recognize that; that is precisely what makes this case so important. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 11:07 am
A recent decision from Ontario's Court of Appeal, North v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:57 pm
In BTG International, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:57 pm
In BTG International, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:49 am
This suspension power was precisely what President Obama used so effectively in reaching a deal without congressional support. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:49 am
This suspension power was precisely what President Obama used so effectively in reaching a deal without congressional support. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Horton v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 10:48 am
Gerrymandering used to be an art, but advanced computation has made it a science. [read post]
